I made an image of the page because this one requires the full context:
Michael sent this one in. I guess child labor laws don’t apply if the kids are adorable. It’s only the ugly kids that get union representation to keep them from having to work the heavy machinery. If they’re adorable, though, they’re stuck on the assembly line for life. Serves ’em right, those cute little bastards.
Honestly, it took me a couple of minutes to figure out why this was put on YSaC. Then I finally noticed the “manufacturing” tag at the top. lol That really changed the context of the rest. Thanks for the great blog. I really enjoy it!
I said it needed the full context!
I know – I’m just not the most observant first thing in the morning 😉
Unsavory.
I wonder if the posting date was a coincidence.
I suspect so. I visited their website (which is what I’ve blurred out) and it had the same casting call on the front page. I’ve also seen the ad posted since, in the correct category.
I think someone just selected the wrong category.
Good eye, though!
Ohhhhh…. manufacturing.
Now it’s funny!
Took me a moment to get what made this so crazy.
I’m just wondering, is the bit about “union” pay rates part of the goof, or is there actually a union for child models?
There’s a union for them. Child performers, too.
I don’t know. Since drmk has been to the website, I can assume they are legit, but any ad on craigslist asking for pictures of young, cute children… Freaks me out. Ew… I hope no one responded.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.